Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

练习

H.1 浏览你每天阅读的报纸,找出三个有歧义的句子或标题。说明歧义的各种来源。

H.2 假设有这样一个领域:在一个基于知识的系统中,coffee 一词可以指以下概念——含咖啡因或不含咖啡因的饮料、用来制作这两类饮料的咖啡粉,以及咖啡豆本身。请论证下列 coffee 用法中哪些具有歧义,哪些含义模糊。

  1. I’ve had my coffee for today.(我今天已经喝过咖啡了。)

  2. Buy some coffee on your way home.(回家路上买些咖啡。)

  3. Please grind some more coffee.(请再磨些咖啡。)

H.3 下面这条规则是我们为例 H.25 给出的翻译,但它并不能合理定义“素食餐厅”的含义:

x  VegetarianRestaurant(x)Serves(x,VegetarianFood)\forall x\; VegetarianRestaurant(x)\Rightarrow Serves(x,VegetarianFood)

请给出一条 FOL 规则,根据餐厅供应的食物更好地定义素食餐厅。

H.4 把下列句子翻译为 FOL:

  1. Vegetarians do not eat meat.(素食者不吃肉。)

  2. Not all vegetarians eat eggs.(并非所有素食者都吃蛋。)

H.5 给出证明下列断言所需的一组事实和推理:

  1. McDonald’s 不是素食餐厅。

  2. 有些素食者可以在 McDonald’s 用餐。

不要只是把这些事实直接放进知识库。请说明如何从有关素食者和 McDonald’s 的一些更一般事实中推导出它们。

H.6 第 12 页曾把 Near(Centro,Bacaro)Near(Centro,Bacaro) 作为句子 Centro is near Bacaro 的翻译。在真值条件语义中,给定某个模型后,这个公式非真即假。请针对 near 这类词的含义,评析这种真值条件方法。

参考文献

Banarescu, L., C. Bonial, S. Cai, M. Georgescu, K. Griffitt, U. Hermjakob, K. Knight, P. Koehn, M. Palmer, and N. Schneider. 2013. Abstract meaning representation for sembanking. 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse.

van Benthem, J. and A. ter Meulen, eds. 1997. Handbook of Logic and Language. MIT Press.

Bobrow, D. G. and T. Winograd. 1977. An overview of KRL, a knowledge representation language. Cognitive Science, 1(1):3–46.

Brachman, R. J. 1979. On the epistemological status of semantic networks. In N. V. Findler, ed., Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers, 3–50. Academic Press.

Brachman, R. J. and H. J. Levesque, eds. 1985. Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann.

Brachman, R. J. and J. G. Schmolze. 1985. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2):171–216.

Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet. 1991. Meaning and Grammar. MIT Press.

Church, A. 1940. A formulation of a simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5:56–68.

Davidson, D. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Dowty, D. R., R. E. Wall, and S. Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. D. Reidel.

Fensel, D., J. A. Hendler, H. Lieberman, and W. Wahlster, eds. 2003. Spinning the Semantic Web: Bring the World Wide Web to its Full Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The case for case. In E. W. Bach and R. T. Harms, eds, Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Green, B. F., A. K. Wolf, C. Chomsky, and K. Laughery. 1961. Baseball: An automatic question answerer. Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference 19.

Heim, I. and A. Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in a Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA.

Katz, J. J. and J. A. Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39:170–210.

Kintsch, W. 1974. The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Wiley, New York.

Lakoff, G. 1972. Linguistics and natural logic. In D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds, Semantics for Natural Language, 545–665. D. Reidel.

Lindsey, R. 1963. Inferential memory as the basis of machines which understand natural language. In E. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman, eds, Computers and Thought, 217–233. McGraw Hill.

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Masterman, M. 1957. The thesaurus in syntax and semantics. Mechanical Translation, 4(1):1–2.

McCawley, J. D. 1968. The role of semantics in a grammar. In E. W. Bach and R. T. Harms, eds, Universals in Linguistic Theory, 124–169. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

McCawley, J. D. 1993. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

McGuiness, D. L. and F. van Harmelen. 2004. OWL web ontology overview. Technical Report 20040210, World Wide Web Consortium.

Montague, R. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In R. Thomason, ed., Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Norman, D. A. and D. E. Rumelhart. 1975. Explorations in Cognition. Freeman.

Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press.

Partee, B. H., ed. 1976. Montague Grammar. Academic Press.

Quillian, M. R. 1968. Semantic memory. In M. Minsky, ed., Semantic Information Processing, 227–270. MIT Press.

Raphael, B. 1968. SIR: A computer program for semantic information retrieval. In M. Minsky, ed., Semantic Information Processing, 33–145. MIT Press.

Russell, S. and P. Norvig. 2002. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall.

Schank, R. C. 1972. Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 3:552–631.

Schönfinkel, M. 1924. Über die Bausteine der mathematischen Logik. Mathematische Annalen, 92:305–316. English translation appears in From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, Harvard University Press, 1967.

Simmons, R. F. 1965. Answering English questions by computer: A survey. CACM, 8(1):53–70.

Simmons, R. F. 1973. Semantic networks: Their computation and use for understanding English sentences. In R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby, eds, Computer Models of Thought and Language, 61–113. W.H. Freeman & Co.

Wilks, Y. 1975a. Preference semantics. In E. L. Keenan, ed., The Formal Semantics of Natural Language, 329–350. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Wilks, Y. 1975b. A preferential, pattern-seeking, semantics for natural language inference. Artificial Intelligence, 6(1):53–74.

Winograd, T. 1972. Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press.

Woods, W. A. 1967. Semantics for a Question-Answering System. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.

Woods, W. A. 1973. Progress in natural language understanding. Proceedings of AFIPS National Conference.

Woods, W. A. 1975. What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins, eds, Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, 35–82. Academic Press.